@troubled-cells sagte in A Word from your Boatswains:
There is a big problem at the moment with users creating fake/alt/imposter accounts.
The people creating these are doing so for the sole purpose of getting the person they are impersonating banned, by using toxic language and hacks.
These accounts usually have a subtle change to the gamer tag they wish to impersonate, for example, adding a extra character or replacing a character with one that at first glance can easily be mistaken as a result of the in game font, for example replacing a L for a 1 or I, where some fonts can make these appear very similar.
I would urge you to take a look at the following videos.
MiddlePegLeg
Choby
Bay Thanger
As a result of what is a very major severe lack of due diligence, users have been and are still falsely being targeted by trolls with the intent of having them removed from the game.
[Off topic]
This is exactly the reason why normal game devs don't let user videos and screenshots count.
Only thing that should ever count as proof are logs from a 3rd party anti-cheat software, nothing else.
Single screenshots might as well just be forged, no need to use accounts with fake names here.
Honestly, I find it kinda outraging that we have some rules about not harassing, using racist slurs etc. which are quite vague regarding the threat of consequence and then it can boil down to them being enforced by user videos.
This only works for admins of private servers like in Battlefield, but issuing a global ban with just a user video as evidence is not acceptable imo.
Tbh I kinda fear the Damokles' sword that one day I'll encounter people that are trolls by heart and decide to f me up badly by forging evidence against me.
Sure, I might not be a great target like more known players, but why shouldn't this happen to me as well? The door is open for that...
Letting user videos count results in just what you mentioned.
[On topic]
I disagree for banning people just for being toxic, racist... by video evidence.
This should only be allowed to be recorded by a designated 3rd party anti-cheat software that might as well just filters some bad words from the chat and issues warnings with the exact threat of consequence.
Not some wibbly wobbly phrases that make you question whether you'll be banned already after the very first offence recorded or not...
Sure, this can be circumvented to a degree, but still better than opening the door for people that deliberately accuse people wrongfully to get them banned.
About the streamers, I barely find words for this.
You scored a great victory against them? You must be either cheating or stream sniping then.
Not to mention that they seem to be a bit privileged over some rules about behaviour in the game (those rules not related to cheating) in comparison to regular players.
@Thor-von-Blitz Let's be honest: All rules that are not gathered under the NEVER section are pretty worthless, as they are more suggestions and don't even include any threat of consequence. Suggestions that when you follow them, you shouldn't fear the consequences of the NEVER section.
Only those of the NEVER section seem to be really relevant in terms of keeping yourself in the game, as vague as some consequence threats might be.